Medicaid
Article

Medicaid enrollees asked state for more collaboration from managed care plans and providers. Will they listen?

Community Solutions Team
Transforming data into progress
Additional Contributors
No items found.
January 13, 2020
Read time:
Download Fact Sheets
Register now
Share this resource
Subscribe to our Newsletter
By subscribing you agree to with our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Download this as a PDF

Each time the Ohio legislature deliberates the state’s $65 billion biennial budget, its members are translating the power granted to them through elections into policy, appropriating dollars on behalf of the 11 million Ohioans who are served by the state government. It is true most of the resources budgeted for Medicaid come from the federal government, with nearly 4 in 5 dollars provided through taxes or by the feds. What’s ultimately truer, however, is that all the resources come from taxpayers. And, in the end, the responsibility of the Medicaid program, as it pays the providers who deliver care, is to ensure that these resources connect people to high-quality medical care, when they need it, in an efficient way.

It is true most of the resources budgeted for Medicaid come from the federal government.

We’ve previously written about how significant Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) are in Ohio’s Medicaid program, and responsible for 1 in 3 dollars the legislature budgets. The reason to invest in a managed care model is logical, in theory: MCOs have the ability to individually negotiate contracts with providers, hire medical staff and leverage data to manage their risk. When they do so effectively, they are rewarded with the savings they produce. Additionally, the state is able to dictate to these companies how they want this relationship to work, defining its expectations for outcomes, costs, quality and consumer engagement. So, what has been the result of this investment? [bctt tweet="#Medicaid Managed Care Organizations are supposed to connect people to high-quality medical care but are they?" username="CommunitySols"]

According to the last external-quality review of MCOs, no single plan met all minimum performance standards in 2018. And, in the latest “report card” issued by the state, where each of the five MCOs have five areas of evaluation, 17 out of the possible 25 scores were average or below. It should be noted, however, the efforts by plans to improve quality have been evident, with many areas of measurement progressing as Ohio has implemented value-based payments. But, given the current, largely average, performance the state is appropriately renegotiating this relationship, and has opened the contract with managed care to new bidders.

In the latest “report card” issued by the state, where each of the five MCOs have five areas of evaluation, 17 out of the possible 25 scores were average or below.

As a part of this process, the state issued a request for public comments and conducted outreach with in-person focus groups they termed “listening sessions.” Hundreds replied to the request for feedback. The state engaged 119 individuals in the fall, in 17 sessions spanning 13 counties and partnering with 36 organizations to promote the sessions (including The Center for Community Solutions). The state did not have to engage in this outreach process as a condition of rebidding, but did and the results of the feedback are interesting.

The state did not have to engage in this outreach process as a condition of rebidding.

For the formal public comment, many professional organizations highlighted the need to improve the relationship between providers and plans, focusing in on shared coordination responsibility, administrative simplification and access to data. Interestingly, for individuals who engaged in the listening sessions, many of the same themes emerged, especially as it relates to better coordination between providers and community-based supports. And while this feedback is important and useful, the state will collect feedback throughout the process, and has created a website to do that and publish up to date info as it becomes available.

What comes next is perhaps the most consequential step. The data shows that managed care, while improving, could be doing more to achieve value. However, it is equally important to remember that the providers delivering care are equally responsible in that mission. The state’s role, then, is not only to keep managed care accountable to the taxpayers, but to also ensure the providers who make money in this system are held to the same standards of effective and efficient care.

Some of this renegotiation may mean the market fundamentally shifts and allows providers to integrate insurance products into their businesses. And there is some evidence to suggest that this sort of model can produce savings and improve outcomes. However, greater market control does not necessarily mean that quality always improves and there is other evidence to suggest that consolidation can even diminish quality and harm patients. So what’s the answer?

Despite all the billions of dollars going to MCOs, hospital systems and other providers, advocates and beneficiaries feel like more can be done.

I’m not sure if there is one answer, but I will look at what the state says when it issues its final request and then how those responses go beyond meeting the basic regulatory standards. Specifically, I want to see proposals that more meaningfully encapsulate the issues and concerns brought forward in the public-input process, particularly from the people who are served in the program. That is the value of such a process. And what that process revealed is that, despite all the billions of dollars going to MCOs, hospital systems and other providers, advocates and beneficiaries feel like more can be done. And, since we’re all ultimately paying for the program, we should expect more collaboration and integration, and less self-interest.

Download Fact Sheets

Ohio Statewide Data

Download

Wood County

Download

Wyandot County

Download

Williams County

Download

Washington County

Download

Vinton County

Download

Wayne County

Download

Warren County

Download

Van Wert County

Download

Union County

Download

Tuscarawas County

Download

Stark County

Download

Summit County

Download

Trumbull County

Download

Shelby County

Download

Seneca County

Download

Scioto County

Download

Ross County

Download

Sandusky County

Download

Richland County

Download

Putnam County

Download

Huron County

Download

Portage County

Download

Preble County

Download

Pike County

Download

Pickaway County

Download

Perry County

Download

Noble County

Download

Paulding County

Download

Ottawa County

Download

Morrow County

Download

Muskingum County

Download

Morgan County

Download

Montgomery County

Download

Meigs County

Download

Monroe County

Download

Miami County

Download

Mercer County

Download

Marion County

Download

Madison County

Download

Medina County

Download

Mahoning County

Download

Lucas County

Download

Lorain County

Download

Logan County

Download

Licking County

Download

Lawrence County

Download

Lake County

Download

Holmes County

Download

Jackson County

Download

Knox County

Download

Jefferson County

Download

Hocking County

Download

Henry County

Download

Highland County

Download

Harrison County

Download

Hancock County

Download

Hardin County

Download

Greene County

Download

Geauga County

Download

Guernsey County

Download

Hamilton County

Download

Gallia County

Download

Fayette County

Download

Fulton County

Download

Franklin County

Download

Fairfield County

Download

Erie County

Download

Darke County

Download

Defiance County

Download

Coshocton County

Download

Delaware County

Download

Cuyahoga County

Download

Crawford County

Download

Columbiana County

Download

Clinton County

Download

Clermont County

Download

Clark County

Download

Champaign County

Download

Carroll County

Download

Athens County

Download

Ashtabula County

Download

Brown County

Download

Butler County

Download

Belmont County

Download

Auglaize County

Download

Ashland County

Download

Allen County

Download

Adams County

Download

Lake County

Download

Geauga County

Download

Cuyahoga County

Download

All Municipalities Geauga County

Download

All Municipalities Lake County

Download

All Municipalities Cuyahoga County

Download

Thompson

Download

South Russell

Download

Russell

Download

Parkman

Download
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Download report

Subscribe to our newsletter

5 Things you need to know arrives on Mondays with the latest articles, events, and advocacy developments in Ohio

Explore the fact sheets

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique.

No Related Fact Sheets

Explore Topics

Browse articles, research, and testimony.