Ohio House Ways and Means Committee: On creating a refundable child tax credit
Chairman Roemer, Vice Chair Thomas, and Ranking Member Troy, thank you for the opportunity to provide proponent testimony on House Bill 96. My name is Kyle Thompson, and I am a policy associate at the Center for Community Solutions. I am joined by Emily Campbell, President and CEO at Community Solutions. The Center for Community Solutions is a nonpartisan, nonprofit think tank that works at the intersection of research, analysis, and communication. My written testimony today will focus on the proposed creation of the Ohio child tax credit within Governor Mike DeWine’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-2027 budget.
Ohio is a state that must help its future thrive. To help families thrive, there must be investments in the future generations of the state that will grow to become leaders of tomorrow. A child tax credit (CTC) would be beneficial to support families by providing tax relief, reducing poverty, and creating an environment for children to grow into productive adults and part of the workforce. Evidence of positive impact from the child tax credit in recent years is notable on the federal level, which I would like to highlight briefly.
Tax policy is an efficient and effective means to incentivize work while supporting families. Across the country, refundable tax credits had the effect of lifting 6.4 million Americans out of poverty in 2023, over half of them children. Refundable tax credits had a greater positive impact on child poverty than any other public program inclusive of hunger assistance, housing subsidies, and direct payments via child support, cash assistance or social security. The federal refundable child tax credit had the effect of reducing child poverty by nearly 2 percent, lifting 1.4 million American children out of poverty.[1] To get the full tax credit, a family must be employed.
We have compelling evidence that targeted tax credits for families incentivize work while improving child wellbeing. In 2021, the expansion of the federal child tax credit increased the total available credit from $2,000 per eligible child to $3,600 for children aged 5 and under, and $3,000 for children between the ages of 6 and 17 at the end of 2021.[2] This was a broad, nearly universal approach to supporting families. Research published by Community Solutions estimated that up to 95 percent of Ohio’s children benefitted from these improvements and had the effect of lifting 10,000 children out of poverty in the City of Cleveland alone, and many thousands more across the state.[3]
The CTC enhancements enabled families to keep more of their earnings, rather than paying it to the government in income tax. Data collected by the U.S. Census Bureau at the time showed the families used the additional resources effectively. In August 2021, among Ohioans who received a CTC payment, 77 percent purchased food, 62 percent purchased clothing, most likely supporting back-to-school, and 41 percent paid for utilities. National studies[4] showed that families who received CTC in 2021 did not reduce their employment. The extra resources were enough to cover some expenses, pay down debt, or save for education, but not enough to cause working parents to stay home.
The federal CTC enhancements expired at the end of 2021, and several states, recognizing an efficient model which encourages parents to remain in the workforce, enacted their own state level child tax credits. If Ohio were to adopt the tax credit, it joins 16 other states across the country.
The Ohio child tax credit included in HB 96 is well-designed to balance impact with investment.
The phased-in framework of the proposed tax credit effectively incentivizes work. Too often, Ohioans must choose between accepting higher pay with the risk of losing benefits or needed access to programs. This tax credit offsets some of the potential loss of other public benefits, enabling families to utilize more of their earnings rather than having to pay them in income taxes. Phasing the tax credit out gradually provides an offramp, allowing families to meet eligibility and continue to enhance their earnings and careers. The refundability of the credit allows it to be targeted to those families most in need.
The added benefit to a child tax credit to Ohioans is that it would provide needed support to families that require financial relief in ways which are directly tied to employment. Tax credits are simple to administer via ordinary Ohio Department of Taxation, so the only cost to the state is the potential revenue which would remain in the bank accounts of working families, rather than transferring to government. Community Solutions looks forward to working alongside members during the budget process.
Thank you for your time. Reach out if you have any additional questions:
Kyle Thompson: kthompson@CommunitySolutions.com
Emily Campbell: ecampbell@CommunitySolutions.com
[1] Shrider, Emily A, “Poverty in the United States: 2023” United States Census Bureau.
[2] Internal Revenue Service (IRS). 2021 Child Tax Credit and advance Child Tax Credit payments — Topic C: Calculation of the 2021 Child Tax Credit.
[3] Campbell, Emily. (2024). Emily Campbell at the City Club: 5 Things about poverty in Cleveland. The Center for Community Solutions.
[4] For example, see “The Anti-Poverty and Income-Boosting Impacts of the Enhanced CTC” Council of Economic Advisors; Hamilton, Leah et. al “The impacts of the 2021 expanded child tax credit on family employment, nutrition, and financial well-being” Brookings; Ananat, Elizabeth et al, “Effects of the Expanded Child Tax Credit on Employment Outcomes: Evidence from Real-World Data from April to December 2021” National Bureau of Economic Research;
Download testimony
Ohio House Health Committee: On legalizing live-saving fentanyl testing equipment
Chairwoman Schmidt, Vice Chairwoman Detter, Ranking Member Somani, and members of the House Health Committee, thank you for the opportunity to provide interested party testimony today on the as-introduced state budget, House Bill 96. My name is Dylan Armstrong and I’m a Public Policy Fellow with The Center for Community Solutions, a nonprofit, nonpartisan think tank focused on improving health, social and economic conditions for Ohioans.
As we all know, the opioid crisis has hit and continues to hit Ohio hard. Addiction, overdoses, and related fatalities continue to plague the state. In 2023, the most recent data available, 4,452 lives were claimed by unintentional drug overdoses. While this is a slight reduction from 2022, there is more we can do to reduce these deaths, and the as-introduced budget includes a perfect example of a strategy to achieve this.
The as-introduced budget expands, beyond fentanyl testing strips, the items that may be lawfully possessed and used to test for the presence of drugs and to prevent drug poisoning, without being considered in violation of the prohibition against drug paraphernalia. Additionally, it would require the State Board of Pharmacy to adopt rules for approving additional types of instruments that may be possessed and used because they demonstrate efficacy in reducing drug poisoning by determining the presence of specific compounds.
Under current law, all drug testing or analyzing equipment is considered drug paraphernalia in Ohio, except for fentanyl test strips. This is problematic when considering how fentanyl test strips work. Fentanyl test strips are dipped into water containing a small amount of well-mixed drug residue and if fentanyl is in that drug residue, then it shows positive. While these test strips are very sensitive, only requiring a small amount to trigger a positive test, the phenomenon called the “chocolate chip cookie effect” is of concern. The idea is that fentanyl can be clumped together in a small pocket, like chocolate chips inside a cookie, meaning that one section of the drug tested could contain fentanyl while the rest does not, which can cause a false negative.
By allowing for additional items beyond fentanyl testing strips to be legalized the chances of detecting fentanyl, or other harmful compounds, can increase.
For example, Xylazine test strips could be used to help detect fentanyl as 9 out of 10 drugs that contain Xylazine also contain fentanyl. But, under current law, Xylazine test strips are illegal. By permitting individuals to acquire the tools they need to make an informed decision, we can enable proper risk management and allow them to take whatever steps are necessary to reduce the possible harm they face.
I want to thank you again for the opportunity to provide testimony as Community Solutions always values the chance to weigh in on policy that would greatly impact the health and wellbeing of Ohioans. We would welcome the chance to share additional research that we have conducted in this space and are happy to answer any questions that you may have. Thank you!
Dylan Armstrong
darmstrong@communitysolutions.com
